Supremes Protect Children From Mutilation And Castration

At last.

The Supreme Court decision we’ve been waiting for came down and the ruling was clear: States may prohibit the mutilation and castration of children under the age of 19. 

No matter what their Munchausen-by-proxy parents and demented doctors want.

The case centered around the Tennessee law prohibiting so-called “gender affirming care” for minors. The ACLU, led by an aptly named lawyer, Chase Strangio, argued that the law banning sex-change treatments for kids was unconstitutional.

While the three nutty lib women on the court may have been fooled by the tired euphemisms that attempt to cloak the ghastly and irreversible medical experiments being performed on confused youngsters as medical care, the majority of the court was not. The vote was 6-3.

Most eloquent in his concurring majority opinion was Justice Clarence Thomas who made Swiss cheese of arguments that “experts” agree the treatments are lifesaving. He exposed their intellectual dishonesty and the ideology behind it. Thomas noted that the Biden administration had sided with the ACLU, arguing that the courts should “defer to so-called expert consensus.”

As we all know, the medical consensus is frequently wrong. Not that long ago, so-called mental health experts believed lobotomies were the way to go.

Now they recommend lopping off bodies parts and putting children on a lifelong regimen of sex hormones that leave most victims (no, they are not patients) infertile and deformed.

“There are several problems with appealing and deferring to the authority of the expert class,” Thomas wrote.

“First, so-called experts have no license to countermand the ‘wisdom, fairness, or logic of legislative choices.’ … 

“Second, contrary to the representations of the United States and the private plaintiffs, there is no medical consensus on how best to treat gender dysphoria in children,” Thomas wrote. 

“Third, notwithstanding the alleged experts’ view that young children can provide informed consent to irreversible sex-transition treatments, whether such consent is possible is a question of medical ethics that States must decide for themselves. 

“Fourth, there are particularly good reasons to question the expert class here, as recent revelations suggest that leading voices in this area have relied on questionable evidence, and have allowed ideology to influence their medical guidance.”

Aha. There you have it. The loudest proponents of transing the kids have “allowed ideology to influence their medical guidance.”

Ya think?

Thank God for the common sense, compassionate majority on this Supreme Court who were willing to protect kids even when doctors cloak their Mengele-like surgeries in words like “care.”

Chloe Cole, a “detransitioner” who’s part of Do No Harm, an organization that opposes sex-change procedures on youngsters, began to transition into a faux male at 12 and had a double mastectomy at 15 at the urging of her doctors, said yesterday that “Every child deserves to grow up whole.”

Amen, m’am.

We don’t administer thin-affirming care to anorexics. Neither should we be mutilating and chemically castrating confused kids.

Twenty five other states have laws similar to Tennessee’s on the books. Children in those states are now safe from the ghouls who lie to and tell them they can change their gender.

Twenty four states to go. Virginia doesn’t protect its children.

Let’s go.